Er, sorry, I mean Dave (I'm sure people knew who I meant). You. :) Anyway, hopefully I didn't misrepresent a statement of yours. I was referring to your message to Carlo Wood where you stated: "...I'm among them. However, I have a hard time articulating what I found difficult about the library, other than that the path portability checks seemed to get in my way. If there's something deeper going on, I'd like to hear your opinion of what it is..." It was this message that I believe I originally replied to stating that internationalization support was an issue (for my company at least). Cheers...
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of David Abrahams Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 5:00 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: [boost] Re: New design proposal for boost::filesystem
"Bennett, Patrick" <Patrick.Bennett@inin.com> writes:
My real issue with boost::filesystem is that as currently defined, it's unusable in an application that will be used around the world. My initial response to this whole thread was just to point out to David that there *are* issues preventing people from using the library. He didn't think there were any, so I was compelled to point out what one of the issues was for me at least.
David who?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost