Douglas Gregor wrote:
1624 failures in 7 libraries (5 are from non-broken platforms) date_time (0 of 14 failures are from non-broken platforms) dynamic_bitset (0 of 1 failures are from non-broken platforms) multi_index (0 of 2 failures are from non-broken platforms) regex (1 of 3 failures are from non-broken platforms) serialization (0 of 1582 failures are from non-broken platforms) test (1 of 19 failures are from non-broken platforms) wave (3)
is the logic here backwards? 1624 failures in 7 libraries (5 are from non-broken platforms) sounds correct but then the following lines appear to have the broken/non-broken counts the wrong way round. Kevin -- | Kevin Wheatley, Cinesite (Europe) Ltd | Nobody thinks this | | Senior Technology | My employer for certain | | And Network Systems Architect | Not even myself |