
19 Jul
2012
19 Jul
'12
4:07 p.m.
AMDG On 07/19/2012 02:06 AM, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
At present is it nobody's job (or everyone's job?) and the result is not really good enough.
So if someone (or two) is willing to take on the task, and we have reasonable confidence in them, we should 'appoint' them (and 'sack' them if it goes badly). At least we can revert to some previous known-ok-ish state.
Who is "we?" Someone still has to take responsibility for making these decisions, which brings us back to the original problem. In Christ, Steven Watanabe