----- Original Message ----- From: <k-oli@gmx.de> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 8:56 PM Subject: Re: [boost] [threadpool] relation with TR2 proposal
Am Samstag, 13. September 2008 10:29:25 schrieb vicente.botet:
Olivier what about adding launch_in_pool to the threadpool library?
I don't know a reason to introduce launch_in_pool!
Well, most of the applications will work very well with only one pool for all the tasks, so the library could provide a private one. Do you think that applications will be more efficient with several pools? Do you have a use case? It would be interesting to compare both approaches.
Olivier, what will be the inpact on your library if it uses Anthony Futures library instead? What will be missing on the Anthony Futures library?
chaining tasks and lazy evaluation of task would not be possible. As Anthony noticed in one of his previous post - Braddocks future lib has more features. Maybe a merge of both future libs will become part of boost.
I remenber, the problem was with the set callback function. Vicente