On 1/25/07, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld@sympatico.ca> wrote:
If the rate regressions were fixed over the last couple of weeks is any indication, getting from this high a number down towards zero will take another year or three... :-(
Just out of curiosity, with the huge jump in regressions (from ~20 -> ~3000) a little while ago, was that a necessary increase on the way to fixing the libraries (i.e. a failure on one compiler belying the presence of a serious flaw in a library), or was it something else: such as changing the way the tests are done; authors of some libraries deciding they can add/debug more features to their own before others fix theirs; etc.? I hope that's a reasonable question. I realise I can get the sources via cvs, but like I said, I'm curious. Regards, Darren