22 Dec
2012
22 Dec
'12
2:55 p.m.
On Saturday 22 December 2012 14:44:40 Phil Endecott wrote:
Also, how do people feel about using Boost.Atomic underneath shared_ptr? (https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5625 - again, I've been using this for a long time and it seems to work.) Maybe as a non-default initially if we're nervous. It might help to find any bugs in Boost.Atomic...
In general I welcome this suggestion. However, shared_ptr probably should not require linking to Boost.Atomic, so some header-only mode should be provided by Boost.Atomic first.