Vladimir Prus wrote:
For avoidance of doubt -- Richard, do you have commit access.
No.
If no, we have two question -- which solution to apply (Richard, can you indicate that) and who gets to check it in.
I took Thomas' email to mean the decision was Fernando's, and it would be him (Fernando) who would commit. I don't have strong opinions on whether we revert or apply my patch. Reverting will definitely break precompiled headers involving <boost/none.hpp> on VC7.1 and Borland; my patch contains Steven Watanabe's attempt to solve this (which I haven't been able to verify as I don't have access to either affected platform, though it compiles and passes its tests on other systems), and includes a test case for the original regression, but it could introduce a regression on some other platforms. If Fernando thinks it's safest to simply revert, that's absolutely fine by me. Cheers Richard