10 Sep
2008
10 Sep
'08
8:43 a.m.
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Johan Nilsson <r.johan.nilsson@gmail.com> wrote:
struct foo { virtual ~foo() = 0; };
inline foo::~foo() {}
Yes, that's what I was doing. Regardless, that particular compiler seems to erroneously discard the inline destructor definition, and then the linker complains that it's missing.
Out of curiosity --as I really don't intend to waste one more minute on it-- is Test.Minimal using all this loathsomeness? -- Genny