-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 19 May 2008 10:05 am, Anthony Williams wrote:
"Dean Michael Berris" <mikhailberis@gmail.com> writes:
Right now, having futures non-default constructable makes it hard(er) to put them in standard containers.
The futures in my proposal can be default-constructed. unique_future requires a move-aware container, but shared_future should be usable in any container.
Turns out the Gaskill future is also default constructible, according to its docs. Where did the idea they neither were default constructible come from? - -- Frank -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIMYv65vihyNWuA4URAqVoAJwMyYOckvqmtaCbDTIQRXEOuVhRSgCgxuys LzXQ1RulJ7LvlnB5r4B1lmo= =7t3C -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----