18 Jul
2011
18 Jul
'11
9:17 p.m.
On 7/18/11 11:43 AM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
Actually, now that I take a second look at it, putting TYPE and DEF together like this might not solve the naming problem you brought up...
How about
BOOST_TTI_GENERATE_HAS_TYPE BOOST_TTI_GENERATE_HAS_TYPE_NAMED
or s/GENERATE/DEFINE/ or s/GENERATE/CREATE/ or...?
Ah, I like GENERATE! It describes exactly what is going on --- i.e., that the purpose of the macro is to GENERATE code for HAS_TYPE. Cheers, Greg