<Oliver.Kowalke@qimonda.com> wrote in news:B1EAFF2DAE7658488B631F25813CD91F01331CCC@drsse602.eu.infineon.com:
Hello,
Instead of bool is_null() const and static guid const& null() I would prefer bool is_nil() const and static guid const& nil().
I prefer null, but I can easily be swayed by this groups voice.
I'de like to see uuid v1 (node hardware address + time based). Access to MAC: - on HP/UX you could use DLPI interface (example: http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/genericDocument?docname=c00904700&cc = us&dlc=en&lc=en&jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN) - ::ioctl + SIOCGIFHWADDR on Linux
This is helpful and gets me one-step closer to creating this functionality.
Because my apps are bloated if I use some header-only libraries from boost I'de like to see guid library not as header-only library - but this was already discussed in this mailing list.
I have not read the thread about making libraries both header-only and not header-only. If this was/is a solution, I will do this.
Regards, Oliver _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Andy.