On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:59:07PM -0800, Paul Mensonides wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:04:16PM +0800, Joel de Guzman wrote:
Why hard-code the limit? I used to hate the preprocessor, but now, I always use boost.preprocessor to generate redundant code, hence, not having a hard coded arity limit. Is there a technical problem not to support more?
Probably not; I just have not done the work. (There are only so many hours you can spend "boostifying" before you decide it's time to stop and put the library up for review.)
(Actually, if you look at the code for "full3" http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~yannis/fc++/FC++.1.5/full.h I am not sure that the currying stuff can be so easily macro-ized. But maybe.)
It looks like it would be pretty easy. Do you want me to do it for you?
If this is not a burden for you, Sure! I'd love to learn more about this preprocessor stuff. else Let's wait for the results of the review. -- -Brian McNamara (lorgon@cc.gatech.edu)