Re: [boost] Announcing lexertl

My interpretation is that the email sig is probably tacked on to anything that the author writes whether or not it is actually proprietary, and means that that the _text of the email_ is (or might be) proprietary. The library itself was not included in the email, so that isn't what is referred to. If it was, then this thread shows that this needed to be stated more explicitly. In any case, I'm curious to know what this library does that Spirit doesn't already. Isn't this just a specialised parser?