8 May
2006
8 May
'06
11:29 a.m.
Hi Felipe, Felipe Magno de Almeida <felipe.m.almeida@gmail.com> wrote:
Dropping asio prefix should be thinked more carefully. While the default implementation wouldnt clash with user code, user's customization could collapse with its own free functions. Or even worse, asio could find through ADL functions that wasnt made to be allocation customization for asio.
Yep, fair enough - it's probably better to be safe. Although it does raise the question of what to call the functions in the proposal for TR2. Any suggestions? Cheers, Chris