29 Jan
2009
29 Jan
'09
5:38 p.m.
My purpose is to make the indirect approach as/more readable and convenient as the direct one so that the user's won't have to tie their code to the underlying framework's points and boxes (i.e they won't have to deal directly with QPoints at all).
It is probably possible to add such an approach on top of a library like ours. However, didn't have this use case before.
It seems that your purpose is rather: Provide lots of algorithms and make them applicable to any type the user is currently working with (the user will still have to know/use QPoints before passing them to the algotithms).
Yes. We don't wrap. Correct. Barend