Stewart, Robert wrote:
Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
At Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:56:19 +0800, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
Actually, I'd +2 if you said a review should be open until the library gets into the main distribution. And even after that, reviewing the quality of the library should be on-going and shouldn't stop at the point of inclusion into Boost. ;)
_That_ is a really cool idea.
I had a lot to say about the review process at BoostCon 2010. It seemed pretty similar to the ideas touched upon in the thread and seemed generally well received. I haven't seen any efforts to implement any of the ideas yet though. http://www.rrsd.com/software_development/boost/BoostCon2010/index.htm Robert Ramey