2 Mar
2005
2 Mar
'05
9:35 a.m.
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> wrote
Andy Little wrote:
IOW the args are 'sugar' in the function pointer/ref case.
Hmmm ... interesting. That seems to be what TR1 says. Do you know why this is?
Not really....but the only useful data to result_of in the function pointer typedef is the return type, while in the case of function-objects the arguments are potent. IOW where T is a function-pointer, T describes it completely ; whereas where T is a function-object, the T(a,b,c) syntax is essential. Therefore when T is a function-pointer, reference or straight function type result_of<T>::type would seem to me to be a valid invocation. regards Andy Little