On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Robert Ramey via Boost
"Only those who have managed a boost review can expect their library submissions to be to be reviewed."
I've thought about volunteering to be a review manager. But I've also considered being a reviewer. It was very intimidating to see my progress and thoughts about a particular library versus other peoples' experience and writings. To the point where I have doubts about my ability to make a meaningful contribution as a reviewer or a review manager. In particular for libraries that lie outside my domain of knowledge, I feel like I have nothing to offer other than perhaps attempting to build and run the tests. If I feel this way, is it possible there are many others who feel the same way? It seems to me that acting as a review manager requires specialized skills and also good knowledge and understanding of the libraries that are in Boost. How could we expect someone whose only knows a little Boost who then writes their own library for a formal review, to cross this knowledge gap?