11 Nov
2008
11 Nov
'08
8:01 p.m.
Hello, Michael. Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 10:43:38 PM you wrote: MM> Sergey Sadovnikov wrote: MM> Many of the boost libraries have evolved beyond their TR1 counter parts. MM> Boost's shared_ptr is a good example of this. I primarily use VC9 SP1 MM> which has a tr1 implementation but I use features of boost::shared_ptr MM> that std::tr1::shared_ptr doesn't have. Do you mean what there is no way to make boost and TR1 implementations don't conflict each other? And, for example, boost::shared_ptr couldn't be transparently replaced by corresponding TR1 class? -- Best Regards, Sergey mailto:flex_ferrum@artberg.ru