I don't know, but I think nobody will complain if you work on bug fixing of Boost.DT... and then asking I you can submit it for a library update (of course I you are interested in working on it and if you have the time). On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev@gmail.com
wrote:
The Boost.DateTime library is very useful, and it is unfortunate to admit that according to Trac report and personal experience, its current state is anything but good. There are long standing tickets, some of them are trivial to fix and have patches already attached. The most annoying ones are missing includes and name clashes (tickets 642, 1740, 1615, 2083, 2091 to name some of them). Is this library still maintained? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Alp Mestan --- http://blog.mestan.fr/ --- http://alp.developpez.com/ --- In charge of the Qt, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence sections on Developpez