Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
- What is your evaluation of the design?
Clean and simple
- What is your evaluation of the implementation?
Straightforward
- What is your evaluation of the documentation?
Sufficient.
- What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
Phoenix V2 uses something like it. It would be nice to replace the implementation with something more general.
- Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems?
I haven't tried the library, but based on what I see, and my experience with such metafunctions, I see no problem whatsoever.
- How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
I've studied the code once before. I didn't do a second study. The library is simple.
- Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
Yes. I vote "YES". Please accept the library into boost. -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net