27 Mar
2010
27 Mar
'10
3:35 a.m.
On 26 March 2010 19:45, Chad Nelson <chad.thecomfychair@gmail.com> wrote:
So again, given that it's going to be less secure, is there a better choice than the Mersenne Twister for systems where no random device is available?
Why not simply accept a Boost.Random (P)RNG, so the users can decide how random they want it to be? If you provide something that you expect will be used for security, it's a *feature* for it to fail when there's no CRNG available.