Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Hi,
I noticed this as popular convention across Boost libraries (e.g. endian) to deal with test cases that may throw or leak exceptions:
int cpp_main( int argc, char* argv[] ) ...
Is there any reason to prefer that one over this one?
int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) ...
cpp_main is not a convention. It's mostly useful when you already have a
common `main` provided by the test framework, whether inside the static test
framework library or in a header such as
https://github.com/boostorg/detail/blob/develop/include/boost/detail/lightwe...
The current state of affairs in Endian is because it used to use