Re: [boost] Formal review request for Hash2

...

One can manually copy and paste the necessary headers:

https://godbolt.org/z/5Maf9Mx9h

Using a "hash archetype" (a skeleton algorithm that doesn't have any definitions) it seems that MyStruct1 and MyStruct3 generate the exact same code, so it must be inlining shenanigans.

mp_for_each, which the described class code uses, probably adds a few more function calls that push things over some Clang limit.

As a general rule, Clang is more conservative with inlining than GCC is, especially at -O3.

Using ripemd_128, the code remains identical: https://godbolt.org/z/8hTdhT3rq

But adding -DNDEBUG makes a difference: https://godbolt.org/z/d8Ga6eKM4 GCC sees through everything and knocks it out of the park, though. https://godbolt.org/z/YfqKnev49