16 May
2007
16 May
'07
2:52 p.m.
On Wed, 16 May 2007 16:25:25 +0200 Marcus Lindblom <macke@yar.nu> wrote:
FWIW, The Xerces C++ API uses the same techinique to version their libraries. It also has issues with forward declaration, as that, also,
needs to be done in the correct namespace.
Right... What type of feedback has there been to this approach among the Xerces users/developers? More meaningful, as it pertains to boost, is it something that has been received warmly, or with disdain? I know nothing about Xerces, so... how is its size relative to the size of boost, and does this approach seem to be something viable for boost?