Paul A. Bristow wrote:
PS Some were also in favour of a "Proposed for Boost" logo to be used only *for libraries in the review queue*, but not yet in a final release. Others felt this was unnecessary. So unless there is strong support for this, it does not form part of this
Jeffrey Bosboom wrote: proposal.
Not only is it necessary, it makes it easy for users of the logo to do the right thing, by not removing the logo when they leave the review queue. Also, with the recent pace of the review queue being as it is, this risks becoming a semi-permanent status, and I'd prefer not to advertise that.
s/necessary/unnecessary/ s/right/wrong/ Sorry for having to send a second correction e-mail; I will proofread more carefully next time. After all, the list isn't going anywhere while I type and read. --Jeffrey Bosboom