13 Jan
2011
13 Jan
'11
3:39 p.m.
13.01.2011 17:25, Vladimir Prus пишет:
- The library is not actually ready. In that case, it should not be in that table at all. I agree. If the library is not ready - why should it be in that table? - The library author does not have the time for review. In that case, the library should also be removed from the list, because Boost is not responsible if the author is busy. I agree. Can we set a policy that:
- A library can only be added in the review schedule if the author has time in near future to have a review, where near future is, say, 3 months. Hmm... Why 3 months?
- Denis