
30 Mar
2010
30 Mar
'10
1:11 a.m.
Scott McMurray wrote:
On 29 March 2010 21:04, Chad Nelson <chad.thecomfychair@gmail.com> wrote:
Close, but not quite: the inverse of zero is zero.
Uh, what? I thought that the point of an inverse is that multiplication gives 1 -- that's certainly what I read at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_multiplicative_inverse
Wouldn't the modulo inverse of 0 be a NaN just like the result of 1/0?
I believe this to be more relevant: http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/AdditiveInverseOfTheZeroInARing.html