18 Aug
2005
18 Aug
'05
10:53 p.m.
--- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@cmu.edu> wrote:
As a side note, perhaps the names read and write should be used rather than send and receive/recv if the library will at some point support I/O on non-sockets, such as pipes and fifos.
Yes, I agree that read and write are better, because of the "portability" of the names to non-sockets that it gives. I've wanted to make that change for some time, but the thing that has been preventing me is what to call the datagram functions sendto and recvfrom, as writeto and readfrom don't seem quite right. Any suggestions? Cheers, Chris