12 Jul
2008
12 Jul
'08
10:23 p.m.
Isn't the 'unique_ptr<>' a replacement for the standard C++ auto_ptr<> that's going to be deprecated in the next standard? -Sid Sacek -----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Loïc Joly Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 6:10 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ? Hello, I was wondering whether there was any plan to implement a unique_ptr in boost, that would replace scoped_ptr, and would default to scoped_ptr on compilers lacking move semantic? Best regards, -- Loïc _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost