Joel de Guzman wrote:
Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
Tobias Schwinger wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
c0, c1, ... cN Returns a fusion sequence of Case objects
seemingly equivalent to
(c0, c1, ... cN)
(note: Application of comma operator ;-)).
?! Why doesn't it just return another (compound) Case object and leave the Sequence an unspecified implementation detail...
So you want switch_ to be
template<class R, class I, class Cases> requires Case<Cases> && BuiltInIntegerOrEnum<I> R switch(I i, Cases cases);
IMO, There is a very big problem here. Suppose that you have a fusion sequence that holds your cases and function objects coming from somewhere else. The problem of adapting it to switch_ is no easier than it would be with my original interface.
Oh man, either my headache is killing me, or I am currently in dumb mode. I can't understand both Tobias and Steven. What's a "compound Case object"?
(c0,c1,...,cN) being just another 'Case' rather than a 'Sequence'. Regards, Tobias