13 Jan
2010
13 Jan
'10
5:06 p.m.
On Jan 12, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Christophe Henry <christophe.j.henry@googlemail.com
wrote:
I think the trade-off is likely to be not so much against run-time but UML features. I'm think about transition conflicts. This one is pretty hard on the compiler. I'd also bet on submachines and entry/exit pseudo states.
The idea would be to do all parts that are “hard on the compiler” at runtime. I don't see why you should have to sacrifice features. Sent from my iPhone