On 11/6/23 6:59 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
On 11/6/23 12:45, Alexander Grund via Boost wrote:
To be clear, if Boost as a whole stops using develop, it doesn't prohibit you from having a branch like that; you can even name it develop, if you like. That is, if master is frozen, you are free to continue your work in other branches.
Thats what I would probably do.
Of course, you would be testing your changes against master branches of the rest of Boost. I suspect, it wouldn't make much of a difference in terms of the "stability" of the Boost release.
This is what I do on my local machine. I think it would make a significant contribution of the quality of the boost release.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost