3 Feb
2006
3 Feb
'06
12:57 p.m.
Shunsuke Sogame wrote:
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
I'm maybe an worrier, struggling with ADL invasions. But short names conflict.
true, that is why begin()/end() were abadened.
I maybe failed persuasion. :-) But "mathematically", I believe ADL customization must be full name that emulates namespace.
Well, I request tag-dispatching customization using class template partial specialization to next Boost.Ranges. Now that I really need tag-dispatching, I'm against ADL customization. I recall you said something like that. You were right. My current ATL/WTL CString range implementation code is horror. Will you add it to TODO list of next Boost.Ranges!
Can you elaborate on what exactly you would like to see? -Thorsten