Maik Beckmann <maikbeckmann@gmx.de> writes: | Am Sonntag 25 November 2007 18:28:47 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
Which brings be to a nother point: It is _very_ bad of a library to require of the application to define NDEBUG to work properly. (The application should be able to decide for itself how NDEBUG/assert should be used.) Ublas should stop using NDEBUG and create their own BOOST_UBLAS_DEBUG or similar and use that instead.
And I should probably go pester the ublas guys as well...
| I'm don't know if I got you wrong, but doesn't BOOST_UBLAS_NDEBUG provide what | you looking for? | <boost/boost/numeric/ublas/detail/config.hpp> | ... | // Enable performance options in RELEASE mode | #if defined (NDEBUG) || defined (BOOST_UBLAS_NDEBUG) | ... | </boost/boost/numeric/ublas/detail/config.hpp> That seems to be unreleased code? Hmm, or am I trying to beat up something does not exist. At lest in 1.33.1 BOOST_UBLAS_NDEBUG is not there. (same in 1.34 it seems) But yes, that seems to provide what I am looking for. Now the rest of the NDEBUG's must be looked at :-) -- Lgb