25 Feb
2009
25 Feb
'09
9:09 p.m.
Giovanni Piero Deretta skrev:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Thorsten Ottosen
Again, I think that the mutating and not mutating algorithm should have different names.
And how is that different from the way adaptors have been given different names from algorithm in the library's current implementation?
IIRC there is no requirement for the range to be sorted: unique will just remove all but one elements on a run of equivalent elements. But I agree that's not how it is often used.
Anyways, probably that's more of a case for encapsulating the sort/unique/erase sequence in a single algorithm.
erase_duplicates(-) ?