on Thu Aug 30 2007, Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 27, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
Since my SoC package constitutes a significant addition to the Boost.Graph library, Jeremy and I felt that it would benefit from the formal review process - especially the newer code that is concerned with the library interface. However, we're unsure if the review needs the same formality as a completely new library since this is, as mentioned, a (albeit rather large) change to an existing library.
I agree with Beman... I don't think we need a full formal review, but something like it would be useful.
In particular, I don't think votes for or against acceptance would be appropriate here. Doug, there is a Trac peer review plugin you might want to think about installing. http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/PeerReviewPlugin -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com