Tobias Schwinger wrote:
Dear Boosters,
what is the reason for the absence of "member_function_pointer_traits" (or alike) in the type_traits library ? To be precise: is it a design decision or just something not yet implemented ?
In the latter case I hereby volunteer for implementing it.
I suggest an interface similar to the one of function_traits
Please, no more trait blobs! IMO you should separate the traits into individual meta functions that works on all function pointer types. For instance: function_arity<T>::type Self explanatory. function_signature<T>::type MPL sequence containing all types of the function signature, including return type and type of *this if T is a member function pointer. And while we're at it, why not deprecate function_traits? -- Daniel Wallin