13 Jan
2011
13 Jan
'11
10:25 p.m.
On 1/13/2011 3:09 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote: > Here is the status of the type-traits addition: > - I added the following operators: +=, *=, -=, /*, %=,&=, |=, ^=,<<, >>> ,>>=,<<=, prefix ++, prefix --, postfix ++, postfix -- so that the > covered operators are now: > - I added in the doc. the fact that private operators are not covered > and lead to compile time errors > - for operators on built-in types that require integer arguments (%, > bitwise op.): I replaced a long list of specialiazation by an > automatic detection > > Remaining work: > 1. check what happens for pointer arguments, > 2. implement trait for: > . operator= > . has_address_of_op<T> > . has_dereference_op<T> > . has_member_access_op<T> > . has_subscript_op<T1 [,T2]> > . has_pointer_to_member_op<T1 [,T2]> > . has_comma_op<T1 [,T2]> > . has_function_call_op<T,R [,P1, ...]> > 3. have an MPL predicate for return value > > As I have only little time (full time work and 3 young children...), I will: > - certainly do 1., > - I will certainly leave 3. to somebody else in the future because I > am not enough agile with MPL, > - as for 2., 3 possibilities: > (i) I do it but it will probably postpone the addition for a long time, > (ii) I just leave it and I know is is a shame not to provide all > operator detection (nobody's perfect) or > (iii) somebody else agrees to add them and have them reviewed at the > same time. Your work on this library is very much appreciated by me. I will look at items 2. and 3. some time in the next week to see if I can help.