18 May
2010
18 May
'10
5:44 p.m.
On 18 May 2010 14:04, Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1@gmail.com> wrote:
I think you are succesfully making the point that Boost.Contract syntax is no worse than that of Boost.Parameter; and since the latter made it into Boost, the syntax of Boost.Contract should be considered acceptable too.
Not at all, that's up to the reviewers to decide. We don't have any requirement to respect a precedent set by another review. There could be reasons why it's good for one library, but not another. It might also be the case that experience with Boost.Parameter suggests that it's a bad idea or just that the Boost.Parameter reviewers did a bad job. Daniel