On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 10:13 +0100, Martin B. wrote:
On 03.11.2010 19:01, John Maddock wrote:
However, there really isn't much point in this unless we also add this to Boost.Build: since it seems that now that this has been rationalized in VC10 I guess "idl=0/1/2" would work well? Unless it's possible to have HID=1 SCL=0 as an option in any VC versions? [...] Adding the name mangling may not be necessary for VS2010: I agree that very few people will actually enable _SECURE_SCL in release mode and if #pragma detect_mismatch works with the boost autolink machinery, then we'll get linker errors anyway.
The generation of link errors is one thing: the ability to pre-build boost for a Windows platform so that the correct libraries are auto-linked is something different. You won't be able to do that unless the idl# is added to the variant name, so I reckon the change is still desirable. Phil -- Phil Richards, <news@derived-software.ltd.uk>