22 Feb
2008
22 Feb
'08
9:49 a.m.
Daniel James wrote:
On 18/02/2008, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
There is a seemingly endless set of improvements to *could* be made to 1.35.0. But I think that it is time to try to identify any showstoppers, fix those, and defer everything else to the next release.
Are broken copyright links considered important enough for this release?
Looks like this is all date-time library stuff? Given that this is a trivial search and replace to fix, and effects only comments not code, I'd say lets fix it, especially if you're willing to do the job ;-) Beman? John.