Hi Paul,
| After a multi-year hiatus,
it is good to see this interesting proposal refined and documented.
Thanks for the support - I think we'd all like to have a functional units library. The Darwinian model for open source obviously works best when there's some competition...
1 It would be helpful to avoid having to build everything to see the output.
So it would be nice to have sample output appended as a long comment
I've added comments with the expected output to the end of the source files.
3 A quick failed attempt to build suggests that the folder /utility is missing?
Sorry - everything but unit_example_1.cpp should compile as is. I was including a utility header that demangles gcc typenames to make them somewhat more readable. I'm attaching a fixed version of unit_example_1.cpp and a new header utility.hpp to be put in the mcs/units directory that factors out the demangling code. Demangling only works on gcc at this point, FYI.
4 I also note the license is not Boost - this would of course be essential, but hopefully only requires some editing.
Naturally, if and when we get to the point where that matters, I'm happy to change it.
5 Meantime I am RTFM ;-)
Fixes are in the Vault - I've also separated out the files into documentation and source to let me update them separately. Please keep the feedback coming... Cheers, Matthias