29 Nov
2008
29 Nov
'08
10:42 p.m.
Jan Stetka wrote:
Hi,
Is there any reason why named_mutex and managed_shared_memory don't have a default constructor?
Because in the review the two step construction (default ctor + open()) was considered harmful. I guess now it would be useful in the presence of move semantics. Is that your intended use case? Regards, Ion