Re: [boost] [IdentityType] Const omission undocumented.

On 16/11/2013 01:02, Mostafa wrote:

#include #include <utility>

int main() { BOOST_IDENTITY_TYPE(( std::pair const )) x; // This compiles, so the const qualification in the // above macro parameter is ignored. x = std::make_pair(0,1);

return 0; }

The omission of const qualification in BOOST_IDENTITY_TYPE types is undocumented. This omission maybe deduced from the documented implementation, but, as noted, that is not part of the library api and is subject to change. I therefore propose that this behaviour be documented as part of the library's public api.

That looks like a bug.