Michael Stevens writes:
Aleksey Gurtovoy writes:
Given that the code compiles with the latests versions of the compiler, the following (from http://tinyurl.com/58lll) is most likely to be a compiler bug, but since the test used to pass some time ago, I was wondering if anyone is interested in making it work again or simply commenting on it before I mark it green:
[snip errors]
OK, seems like nobody is interested in these, marked up as expected.
I took a quick look. It seems like gcc-2.95 has namespace problems when BOOST_USING_STD_MIN/MAX Since Random never worked on systems without min/max in std I have simplified and use std::min/max instead. This fixes gcc-2.95 and should not regress on any of the good compilers.
If this looks good in the tests tomorrow I will remove the failure markup.
Thank you, Michael! -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering