Rene Rivera wrote:
Pavol Droba wrote:
BOOST_PP helps me a lot in here, however it is not crusial for the library. So if there is no other way to handle this I can rewrite the file to be without the preprocessor.
It does help you.. It's saving a lot of typing in this case.
Are you sure, that there is no other way around?
I'm about to try a last one... which is to replace the BOOST_PP_SEQ_ENUM, with some form of BOOST_PP_ARRAY, and possible just a custom ARGn set of macros.
OK, figured out a fix, with slightly more typing at each test line, but it eliminates the use of BOOST_PP without eliminating the time saving TEST* macro. I checked in the changes, and I'm running a full set of tests now. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq