On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Christopher Jefferson <chris@bubblescope.net> wrote:
On 5 Feb 2011, at 19:46, Bryce Lelbach (wash) wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 10:26:20 -0800 Doug Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com> wrote:
Clang itself is just now getting some C++0x support. It has rvalue references, variadic templates, decltype, static_assert, and some other goodies. We think it's in decent shape, but obviously we need more testing coverage.
On Darwin. On Linux, clang C++0x support is a moot point because clang-linux uses the GNU stdlib. Also, according to the regression tests, clang + libc++ can't compile most of Boost.
I started those tests just a day ago. I managed to mess up both the user-config.jam, and stopping the results getting submitted to the official boost test page. Hopefully more reasonable tests should appear in the next couple of days.
Great!
Out of interest, how should I best add c++0x to clang? At the moment, I am just passing -std=c++0x as a compileflag.
You might want to use -std=gnu++0x, to enable GNU extensions. That's the same recommendation one usually sees for C++0x in GCC. How is this handled in Boost.Build? Is there some global C++0x feature that we should be hooking into? - Doug