What I'd like to see short-term: * Handle enhanced compiler warnings.
Would you please go into more detail here? We currently test with -Wall -Wextra.
Yes. I would like to. I appreciate and benefit from (at bare minimum in GCC): -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -Wconversion -Wsign-conversion And sometimes I even go for -Werror You would face a much larger onslaught of warnings with a commercial-grade CERT-C++ checker, so that set above is actually rather slack in my world. I can provide qan actual build-log with line numbers if needed. Or I can just PR the changes if you like. The whole warning-game is just like, hey, why the noise? 90% of the warnings are useless, but every once in a while you get a nugget that (might) prevent you a really big crash. So I just activate a bunch of warnings, handle them all and simultaneously weed out the good stuff. Here is my typical warning set "on the metal" real-time-cpp/ref_app/target/app/make/app_make.gmk at 8cc0ce3dd26c30eeba21a1826716f7604f5ef2e4 · ckormanyos/real-time-cpp | | | | | | | | | | | real-time-cpp/ref_app/target/app/make/app_make.gmk at 8cc0ce3dd26c30eeba... Source code for the book Real-Time C++, by Christopher Kormanyos - ckormanyos/real-time-cpp | | | Kind regards, Christopher On Tuesday, December 10, 2024 at 09:28:10 PM GMT+1, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote: Christopher Kormanyos wrote:
But here comes the fun part. When I studied the implementation it seemed highly portable. So I put it onto several embedded bare-metal systems. The code compiled and ran on 32-bit microcontrollers and even ran on an 8-bit controller. Rarely do we find such portability and quality in Boost-proposed libraries, or anywhere for that matter. Kudos on a job well done!
Thanks Christopher. :-)
What I'd like to see short-term: * Handle enhanced compiler warnings.
Would you please go into more detail here? We currently test with -Wall -Wextra. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost