"Reid Sweatman" <drunkardswalk@earthlink.net> wrote in:
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of David Abrahams Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 4:55 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Cc: boost-docs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [boost] Re: JavaScript index?
<snipped>
That is a beautiful piece of work. I don't know what the next step is, but maybe it would be a good idea to take an informal poll. Does anyone actually object to the idea of integrating this thing into the official Boost documentation?
I believe I was actually responding to this post with my post to the "new look and feel" thread. Apologies. Yes, beautiful, and very nicely done. But have a look at what I said there, and see if there was any merit in my comments (and should they prove content-free, I'll re-lurk, or to put it more poetically, "steal softly and silently away." <g>).
I don't see a post by you which appears to be intended for this thread ... Wait -- is this it?
I agree, especially with the remark concerning a single-page option; why not turn that into a "print version" if possible? The two things I note are that the numbering is left-justified, which isn't the norm for a TOC, and that the items B, C, and D at the bottom of the first page don't correlate syntactically with anything else on the page in an obvious manner, and beg the obvious question concerning A.
If so, could you explain what you mean about the numbering being left-justified? Also, I know that I use A, B, C, D as section labels in the example website (http://tinyurl.com/5wbcw) but otherwise I don't follow you. I apologize if this is not the passage you were referring to. Your comments about accessibility in the other thread are important, too. With the tree control, I went out of my way to make sure pages could be bookmarked and that the documentation was viewable with text-only browsers. Are there other accessibility problems you see? Best Regards, Jonathan